This exercise explores the next
level of intervention and allows you to make changes that many would say go
beyond reality. At the end of the
exercise, you’ll be asked to make up your own mind.
Photograph a close-up, head and shoulders portrait in available or natural lighting. The face should not be receiving direct light. Make two selections, one at a time, each with its own adjustment. The first should be the entire face, which you should adjust by increasing the brightness and increasing the contrast. This effect will draw attention to the face which is standard dodging and should appear natural.
The second selection and adjustment should of the eyes only, limit this to the iris and pupil, not the eyelids or surrounding skin. First, exaggerate the colour of the iris by increasing saturation and brightness. Next try changing the hue. Save both versions.
At what point between lightening the face for visibility and altering the eye colour do you consider that you have tamper with reality? Or are you satisfied that all of this is legitimate?
-----------------------------------------------------
JasmineThis exercise asked me to change the colour of the child’s face using Hue & Saturation. Here’s the start picture:
Part One
Jasmine had a naturally pale skin which, if you adjusted it too much became blotchy and showed red patches, so I had to take care not to make too many strong changes using the Brightness and Contrast. Here’s her face after I had adjusted the B & C:
In fact, at one point I contemplated using the minus part of the slider as this seemed to make her look better than using the plus side of the slider.
Part Two
The second selection and adjustment
should of the eyes only, limit this to the iris and pupil, not the eyelids or
surrounding skin. First, exaggerate the
colour of the iris by increasing the Hue.
I added in the Colorize as this gave a better colour change.
Next try changing the Saturation.
So here we are a blue/grey eyed girl now with orange/brown tiger
coloured eyes.
I went on to add extra teeth to her
mouth as there were two major ones missing and I felt this would enhance her
smile with them replaced. You can see the gaps quite clearly
on both sides of her mouth. Firstly, I selected
the most likely shaped tooth to copy. Below
you can see the two teeth I decided to copy and reshape to fit the shape of her
mouth.
The first thing I did was to find a similar shaped
tooth in Jasmine’s mouth and copied it, saving it in TIFF format:
Then I adjusted the colour of the
new teeth so that they matched the existing ones.
Here’s Jasmine with her new teeth
and improved complexion, see what you think?
This whole question is one that not
only photographers ponder over. It can
be to some as to how far do you go, others feel that you shouldn’t do anything
but it’s hardly anything new as printers in wet film darkrooms were doing the
exact same thing but not in such a sophisticated way. We all remember the dodging, burning, enhancing
and either softening or sharpening in the darkroom.
My own opinion is that slight changes are acceptable but if a printer sets out
to deliberately misrepresent a situation then that is unacceptable. Deliberate misrepresentation can be either to
enhance a person’s features/situation or go completely the other way and cause
great distress. In this day of almost
instant communication with such internet sites as Facebook, twitter and YouTube
great distress and bully can occur before a site is taken down. Misinformation can be spread (in the form of
pictures and/or words) and spread extremely quickly, so much so it is almost
unstoppable.








No comments:
Post a Comment